David Seaton's News Links
The imminent Turkish invasion of Iraqi Kurdistan is not getting much coverage in the English speaking press despite the fact that such an invasion would change the entire situation in the Middle East and also affect NATO and the European Union in many and entirely unpredictable and far reaching ways.
Anyone who has ever read Xenophon's adventures fighting in Kurdistan in 401 BC-399 BC will know what serious business it can be.
We may be looking at the most significant "unforeseen outcome" of Bush's geopolitical suicide. DS
US forces sidestep threatened Turkish invasion - Debka
The heavy Turkish military buildup on the border of Iraqi Kurdistan last week prompted the autonomous region’s president, Massoud Barzani, to send a personal emissary, Safin Dizai, to Ankara with an urgent message.
Turkish tanks would not be allowed to cross into northern Iraq, he said. The Kurdish army known as peshmerga would repel them. “The people of Kurdistan,“ said the messenger, “would not stand by as spectators if Turkish tanks and panzers entered Kirkuk.” And finally, “Turkey also knows that a military incursion is out of the question. The world will not allow this. The US is here and does not want it.”
The Kurdish leader had his answer Thursday, May 31, when Turkish chief of staff Gen. Yasar Büyükanıt declared his army was ready for incursion into northern Iraq. "There is not only the PKK in northern Iraq,” he said. “There is Massoud Barzani as well"
This incursion unheeding of strains with Washington would have two objectives, according to DEBKAfile’s military sources: To prevent the rise of an independent Kurdish state in northern Iraq and the fall of the oil town of Kirkuk into Kurdish hands. “Turkey cannot afford an independent Kurdish state headed by Barzani on its southern border,” said Gen. Büyükanıt.
Our sources add that Ankara has dramatically broadened its objectives since early May, when the Turks talked about a limited strike against separatist PKK hideouts in the Kandil mountains of N. Iraq. At the same time, as DEBKA-Net-Weekly 294 revealed on March 23, 80,000 Turkish troops were concentrated already then at Sirank, opposite the meeting point of the Turkish, Iraqi and Syrian borders.
A bombing in downtown Ankara earlier this month killed six people and injured more than a hundred. The PKK was blamed.
Sunday, May 27, US Secretary of state Condoleezza Rice and Turkish foreign minister Abdullah Gul discussed the possible outbreak of Turkish-Kurdish hostilities. Immediately after the conversation, the US military command began its preparations. Washington decided its first priority must be to avoid a military clash between US forces stationed in Kurdistan and invading Turkish units. No time was lost. May 30, US commanders and Barzani signed a document transferring security responsibility for the region from coalition forces to the Kurdish peshmerga. American troops were hurriedly pulled out of the Kurdish towns of Irbil, Dohuk and Suleimaniyeh, but remain in force in and around Kirkkuk.
The imminent Turkish invasion of Iraqi Kurdistan is not getting much coverage in the English speaking press despite the fact that such an invasion would change the entire situation in the Middle East and also affect NATO and the European Union in many and entirely unpredictable and far reaching ways.
Anyone who has ever read Xenophon's adventures fighting in Kurdistan in 401 BC-399 BC will know what serious business it can be.
We may be looking at the most significant "unforeseen outcome" of Bush's geopolitical suicide. DS
US forces sidestep threatened Turkish invasion - Debka
The heavy Turkish military buildup on the border of Iraqi Kurdistan last week prompted the autonomous region’s president, Massoud Barzani, to send a personal emissary, Safin Dizai, to Ankara with an urgent message.
Turkish tanks would not be allowed to cross into northern Iraq, he said. The Kurdish army known as peshmerga would repel them. “The people of Kurdistan,“ said the messenger, “would not stand by as spectators if Turkish tanks and panzers entered Kirkuk.” And finally, “Turkey also knows that a military incursion is out of the question. The world will not allow this. The US is here and does not want it.”
The Kurdish leader had his answer Thursday, May 31, when Turkish chief of staff Gen. Yasar Büyükanıt declared his army was ready for incursion into northern Iraq. "There is not only the PKK in northern Iraq,” he said. “There is Massoud Barzani as well"
This incursion unheeding of strains with Washington would have two objectives, according to DEBKAfile’s military sources: To prevent the rise of an independent Kurdish state in northern Iraq and the fall of the oil town of Kirkuk into Kurdish hands. “Turkey cannot afford an independent Kurdish state headed by Barzani on its southern border,” said Gen. Büyükanıt.
Our sources add that Ankara has dramatically broadened its objectives since early May, when the Turks talked about a limited strike against separatist PKK hideouts in the Kandil mountains of N. Iraq. At the same time, as DEBKA-Net-Weekly 294 revealed on March 23, 80,000 Turkish troops were concentrated already then at Sirank, opposite the meeting point of the Turkish, Iraqi and Syrian borders.
A bombing in downtown Ankara earlier this month killed six people and injured more than a hundred. The PKK was blamed.
Sunday, May 27, US Secretary of state Condoleezza Rice and Turkish foreign minister Abdullah Gul discussed the possible outbreak of Turkish-Kurdish hostilities. Immediately after the conversation, the US military command began its preparations. Washington decided its first priority must be to avoid a military clash between US forces stationed in Kurdistan and invading Turkish units. No time was lost. May 30, US commanders and Barzani signed a document transferring security responsibility for the region from coalition forces to the Kurdish peshmerga. American troops were hurriedly pulled out of the Kurdish towns of Irbil, Dohuk and Suleimaniyeh, but remain in force in and around Kirkkuk.
3 comments:
Turkey must apply some new strategy if it is to avoid a Lebanon/Israel style outcome on the one hand of guerilla decapitation, Or an America/Iraq type outcome on the other hand of completed invasion.
Weaker but prepared and motivated opponents on the defense have proven that they can stymie even the most powerful conventional offensive armies, and on the cheap as well. The way Barzani has egged on the Turks, one can well guess that he actually wants Turkey to "bring 'em on".
Of course, the desabilization that an invasion would create in the wider ME would be a disaster that will lead to further disasters...but given the increasingly hot public pronouncements on both sides, momentum is building to a point where Turkey will be humbled if it does NOT invade.
One gets the feeling that a great, destructive machine has been set in motion and no one seems to know how to turn it off.
I predict that without some clear resolution to Turkish/PKK conflict, Turkey will be left with a money, prestige and life draining quagmire, while Kuridstan will be left without any infrastructure to speak of before too long. And thats just for starters.
1MaNLan
Its odd that we can just sit here and accept that the Turks have a legitimate point.
Arent they really just 'planning and waging agressive war'?
If we accept this then the Serbs get a pass, as do the NAZI's and the Russians in Chechenya.
We are seriously on the wrong path!
Good morning! Welcome to the "new world order". I hope you never believed that all this was really about what they said it was all about.
Post a Comment