Showing posts with label Washington. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Washington. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

One man's Mao is another man's Washington

David Seaton's News Links
It is interesting that in Russia, both Lenin and even Stalin are still revered and that in China Mao Tse-Tung remains the symbol of the nation, its power and its unity.

Book after book has appeared in the west, year after year denouncing Lenin, Stalin and Mao: their crimes, sexual perversions and even in Mao's case the subject of his personal hygiene (the "great helmsman" was apparently allergic to soap and water), but still the people that suffered them most still revere their memory.

Americans refer to other nation's patriotism as "nationalism" and see that as a bad thing. Great American patriots and founders of the nation like Washington and Jefferson owned slaves and Jefferson's only descendants are black because he sexually exploited the slave girls at his mercy. Revisionist historians are now trying to prove that Abraham Lincoln was gay. Still Americans revere them for the same reason this article in the Los Angeles Times says that the Chinese revere Mao: because "he won the civil war and united China" and "he is remembered for uniting China and setting it on a course for prosperity". The lesson would be that, if you treasure your identity, with a little imagination you will understand that others treasure theirs too... even Iraqis. DS


Mao marches on - Los Angeles Times

Abstract: During a recent visit to Beijing, I was looking at the sky on a clear night when I was startled to see the ghost of Mao Tse-tung staring down at me. The legendary tyrant's mellow, moon-like visage sparkled above a spanking-new shopping center while a hidden PA system amplified his high-pitched Hunan accent: "The Chinese people have stood up!"(...) Mao's space at The Place is both ironic and dead serious. Mao, who branded China with a sharp and cutting anti-capitalist philosophy, is now a brand name in his own right, bestowed with the pride of place in an opulent urban mall, occupying center stage in a slick piece of visual propaganda drawn from archival footage. The Mao show, exalting the lineage of China's Communist Party leadership as an important party congress approaches, is sure to stir a flutter of reflexive pride in the casual passerby, well-heeled shopper and barefoot rag-picker alike. Deng Xiaoping, the late strongman who overturned Mao's legacy and put the workers' paradise on the road to being a shoppers' paradise, is conspicuous by his absence.(...) By and large, the Mao statues that were once so ubiquitous in Beijing are gone, but Mao never really went away. In fact, one can hardly make a purchase in China without seeing his dreamy visage, especially on the 100-yuan bill, the bill of all bills at a time when making money is truly the lifeblood of China.(...) There have been periodic bouts of nostalgia for Mao before, none more potent than the spontaneous popular uprising at Tiananmen in 1989. The demonstrators, despite their media-pleasing democratic rhetoric, had a decidedly Maoist cast. No one understood this better than Deng, the man who ordered the crackdown in fear of being deposed in a second Cultural Revolution. Both Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao, though anointed by Deng for succession, have done much to stabilize and secure Mao's reputation, in no small part to bolster their own communistic legitimacy while freeing themselves from the Dengist straitjacket. Mao might have been a tyrant, as aloof as an emperor, but he won the civil war and united China, not unlike a ruthless predecessor he was said to admire. China's founding emperor, Qin Shihuangdi, was not a nice man by any reckoning, but he is remembered for uniting China and setting it on a course for prosperity. Every time we utter the word China -- "land of Qin" -- we inadvertently invoke the tyrant's legacy. And so too will Mao's legacy be invoked again and again, rough edges gradually smoothed out over time, reduced to a rounded pebble in a turbulent, ever-changing stream. READ IT ALL

Wednesday, July 11, 2007

Larry and the Pharisees (what a name for a band!)

David Seaton's News Links
One of America's most amusing blood sports is the outing of pharisees. One of America's most useful citizens is Larry Flynt. DS

Flynt, Palfrey target D.C. 'hypocrisy' - The Politico
Abstract: Hustler publisher Larry Flynt, already on a hunt for Washington sex scandals, has teamed up with a powerful new ally: "D.C. Madam" Deborah Jeane Palfrey. It's an alignment born from coincidental interests: Flynt wants to expose Washington hypocrites, and Palfrey has a long list of people who probably qualify. Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) became their first victim when a Flynt investigator linked his name and honorable title to an old telephone number on Palfrey's client list. Vitter's exposure on Tuesday should put any other conservative Republican with sexy skeletons on notice: Start practicing your mea culpa. It's déjà vu for many on Capitol Hill who lived through Flynt's first, successful 1998 sex-scandal bounty hunt, conducted at the height of the sex-driven impeachment drive against President Bill Clinton. With a promise of millions but a payout of less, Flynt managed to expose the sexual promiscuity of former House Judiciary Chairman Henry Hyde of Illinois, former impeachment prosecutor Bob Barr and -- his biggest catch of all -- the almost-Speaker Bob Livingston, another Louisianan, who confessed to adultery and resigned from Congress when he was on the brink of succeeding Speaker Newt Gingrich. (Gingrich's affair was not exposed by Flynt; that came later.) Most folks on Capitol Hill, for now, are hoping Vitter is an isolated incident. READ IT ALL

Friday, January 12, 2007

War with Iran

"If the US goal is to start a war with Iran, it may well achieve it."
Editorial - Guardian - January 12, 2007

"The speech reflects a profound misunderstanding of our era. America is acting like a colonial power in Iraq. But the age of colonialism is over. Waging a colonial war in the post-colonial age is self-defeating. That is the fatal flaw of Bush's policy."
Zbigniew Brzezinski - Washington Post

David Seaton's News Links
Anyone who has read Robert Fisk's marvellous book, "The Great War for Civilisation: The Conquest of the Middle East", and especially anyone who has read with attention the chapters on the eight year war between Iraq and Iran, will have some idea of what fighting a war against Iran would be like. If the United States had no other enemies in the world or any other irons in the fire, it might be able to pull it off and I even doubt that. But if it plugs its prestige and power into the high-tension wire of the Shiite tradition of martyrdom and sacrifice, it could find itself with all its fuses blown in the middle of a great depression. 2007 may turn out to be the worst year in the history of the United States. DS

The tension mounts - Editorial - Guardian
Abstract:
Within hours of President Bush's television address, in which he launched his latest strategy for Iraq and rejected any notion that Iran and Syria could be part of the solution, US commandos were putting their commander-in-chief's words into action. Eight helicopters descended on the Iranian consulate in the Kurdish-controlled city of Irbil and seized five Iranian diplomats. "Kidnapped" was the word the Kurds used.(...) From Iran's point of view, the US presence in the region is rapidly becoming more aggressive. First, Washington announced that it was going to send a second aircraft carrier to the Gulf. Then, the UN security council imposed sanctions. Then, there were leaks in Israeli and British press suggesting that Israel is considering using its nuclear arsenal to destroy the one that Iran is widely believed to be trying to build. America, meanwhile, is putting more pressure on international banks to pull out of Iranian ventures, in a move which hit Iran's oil sector and its only means of earning hard currency.(...) Iran's relationship with the Shia firebrand Moqtada al-Sadr is tense. Moqtada has alternatively played the Arab nationalist card against Persian influence, and pledged that if Iran were attacked, he would put his militias at Iran's service. But this ambiguity would disappear if Moqtada himself were to be attacked. If the extra US brigades attempt to clear Moqtada out of his stronghold in the slums of Sadr City, an attack would almost certainly be seen as one on an Iranian proxy. Moqtada's men might be elevated to the status of being the Hizbullah of Iraq by a bloody assault on Sadr City.(...) If the US goal is to start a war with Iran, it may well achieve it. READ IT ALL

Sunday, December 17, 2006

A Christmas story - #1

David Seaton's News Links
I couldn't risk your missing it. More than a tip of the hat, this is reprint ripped off directly from megablogger, "Lawrence of Cyberia's" post, complete with a fantastic drawing by "Mr Fish" of Harpers Magazine and this wonderful quote by my favorite American politician, Dennis Kucinich, who, because he speaks nothing but good sense and has lousy hair, is considered a hopeless nut. DS

While it is natural and appropriate for Americans to first focus upon the deaths of American service members in Iraq, it's astounding to consider that for every service member killed, 200 Iraq civilians have been killed....

What are the short-term and long-term implications of this massive number of deaths to Iraqi civil society? Will the millions of Iraqi children who have lost a parent ever forgive our country for igniting this violence? How do we make peace with the generations of Iraqis severely harmed by this unnecessary war of choice?

-- Rep. Dennis Kucinich, Congressional Hearing on Civilian Casualties in Iraq, 11 Dec 2006. (via Informed Comment).

Tuesday, November 21, 2006

Iran to host Iraq security talks - BBC News

David Seaton's News Links
Things are moving fast now. Diplomatically this is the equivalent of a bank failure. You may have seen pictures where the depositors form long lines in the street hoping to retrieve some small fraction of their life savings. The only thing crueler than America's ongoing humiliation in the Middle East is the endless and needless suffering of the people of Iraq. DS
Abstract: Iraq's President Jalal Talabani has accepted an invitation from his Iranian counterpart to discuss ways of tackling the violence in Iraq. Mr Talabani's office said he would meet President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in Tehran on Saturday. Some reports say Syria's President Bashar al-Assad may attend. The US has given a guarded response to the prospect of the talks in Tehran. The Iraqi government has also said Syria and Iraq are planning to restore full diplomatic ties, cut in 1982.(...) Analysts say the US government has been more amenable to regional diplomacy since heavy losses for President George W Bush in 7 November mid-term elections. However, Washington gave a cautious response to the news of Mr Talabani's trip to Tehran. READ IT ALL